<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="orablog/0.3+" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moving to Oracle</title>
	<link>http://www.lamp2lapo.com/2006/09/20/moving-to-oracle/</link>
	<description>Helping PHP developers migrate from MySQL to Oracle</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 09:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://www.orablog.org/?v=0.3+</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: leandro</title>
		<link>http://www.lamp2lapo.com/2006/09/20/moving-to-oracle/#comment-634</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 16:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lamp2lapo.com/2006/09/20/moving-to-oracle/#comment-634</guid>
					<description>Wrong choice.  Go for PostgreSQL: it is already as fast as Oracle, no arbitrary limits, it is soon to be even faster, no need to pay for lots of options, much more standards-compliant, and it is much more featured about programming — think PL/PSM, boolean data types, PL/Scheme, PL/Java, PL/Ruby, PL/bash, PL/Python — and have I mentioned it is fast, it is free software, and enables great programming?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrong choice.  Go for PostgreSQL: it is already as fast as Oracle, no arbitrary limits, it is soon to be even faster, no need to pay for lots of options, much more standards-compliant, and it is much more featured about programming — think PL/PSM, boolean data types, PL/Scheme, PL/Java, PL/Ruby, PL/bash, PL/Python — and have I mentioned it is fast, it is free software, and enables great programming?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
